We have prepared a guidance document summarising the work of the Monitoring Design and Monitoring Technologies working groups, which developed proof-of-concept resources to help regional councils, government and multi-agency catchment groups design monitoring programmes that will measure the effectiveness of actions to improve freshwater.
New Zealanders share an understanding that, like people, our rivers have the right to be healthy and safe (te mana o te wai). We all want rivers our children and grandchildren can grow up swimming in, like our ancestors did.
Many people who farm, community and iwi groups, and people working as part of the Jobs for Nature programme are taking action to improve freshwater quality, through activities such as stream fencing and planting, wetland restoration, and changes in farming practice.
Monitoring the collective effect of these activities on water quality has not been standard practice in New Zealand – but it is now urgently required. In 2020, the government introduced regulations that aim to improve the quality of New Zealand’s fresh water within five years and restore freshwater ecosystems to a healthy state within a generation. The policy package requires water quality trends to be monitored over time, and tasks regional councils with establishing monitoring methods.
For this to happen, we need to fill some critical gaps and shortcomings in our current monitoring methods and networks. People in regional councils need a framework to help them design monitoring programmes that will measure the effectiveness of actions to improve freshwater, and to help them select appropriate monitoring technologies that enable early detection of improvement.
These monitoring programmes will give people taking action on the ground information on successes and failures of past actions, helping them prioritise the most effective actions to improve freshwater quality, so our rivers more quickly return to good health.
2024 update: A research programme, Monitoring Freshwater Improvement Actions, was developed following the completion of work by the two working groups mentioned in this article. Additional resources produced between 2021 and 2023 can be found at the project website, Monitoring Freshwater.
Read more in Guidance: Designing Freshwater Monitoring Programmes to Detect Early Improvement (8-page PDF), including a recommended 5-step process for monitoring the effectiveness of actions to improve freshwater
The two working groups identified requirements for further work that will be necessary to develop a fully functioning tool to guide the development of freshwater monitoring programme that enable regional councils (and others with responsibility for Aotearoa’s fresh water) to detect early improvement in water quality.
Find more information on each of these requirements in Guidance: Designing Freshwater Monitoring Programmes to Detect Early Improvement (8-page PDF)
More information:
Author
Hi
First of all, I must congratulate you on the detailed documents and tools that have been developed on this website.
I would like to pose a friendly question to address issues in Canterbury and no doubt other areas as well to expand the drivers form Pollutant / drivers P38.
If you change Pollutant / drivers to degradation elements it then enables you to consider flow removal as a driver.
If you expand the secondary response variables to include the river and riverbed it enables a more holistic view of the instream response as well as the water edge where the majority of biodiversity exists in and around the water edge.
if you expand tertiary the response variables to include birds, insects, terrestrials etc ie it then encompasses the biodiversity of the whole water body for people to appreciate the linkages between them.
It would enable people to understand the impacts drivers for all rivers streams and lakes. Particularly braided rivers as well. Quite often its flow reduction that has a greater impact biodiversity as it then intensifies the impacts of all the other drivers. On a big river vs a small one’s pollutants have a smaller impact simply due to the size difference of water volume between them..
Leave a Reply