Recent global events, including climatic shifts, shipping issues, and geopolitical tensions have driven international feed prices to new highs, putting New Zealand's reliance on imported grain for livestock feed under the microscope.
AgFirst’s new report on the Implications of Global Price and Supply of Supplementary Feeds examines the state of grain internationally and what it means for New Zealand livestock farmers. Below, report co-author Raewyn Densley discusses the analysis.
In 2022, New Zealand's imports of internationally produced feed – grain, concentrates, and PKE – reached 3.7 million tonnes. The dairy sector is the largest consumer, absorbing 75% of feed imports, followed by poultry at 12% and other livestock, including pigs, at 4%. PKE alone accounts for 6% of total feed in dairy systems, including pasture.
Overall, our demand for supplementary feed outstrips domestic supply by nearly double – in 2022 we produced 2.1 million tonnes, but consumed an estimated 5.8 million tonnes. In the same year, 40% of the ingredients for supplementary feed were grown in Aotearoa New Zealand – although this is skewed to 69% in the South Island and only 25% in the North Island. The remaining 60% was imported.
Demand is expected to continue to increase for the dairy and poultry sectors.
Multiple factors converged in 2022 to drive grain prices to record levels: geopolitical issues such as the Russia-Ukraine conflict, weather causing poor yields, and logistics and shipping issues all contributed to the downward trend in the availability of grain for global trade. The global wheat price hit an all-time high in February 2022, with maize peaking in April 2022.
While this perfect storm of events is unlikely to occur again, we can expect many factors to impact the supply and price of grain.
The first is profitability concerns: Even though our dairy farms are relatively less sensitive to feed price hikes compared to poultry farms, higher prices still affect their bottom line. For example, assuming an average milk solids conversion of 100 gMS/kgDM fed and a milk solids price of $8.00/kg, each kilogram of supplement fed generates a milk return of $0.80. If the supplement costs $0.40/kgDM ($400/tDM) fed the return is $0.40 or 50%. If the supplement rises to $0.60/kgDM ($600/tDM) fed, the return drops to $0.20 or 25%. High supplement prices can therefore make supplement use less profitable or even unprofitable.
The second concern is around supply. We found that the importers we interviewed felt confident of continued access to supplies, however this could come at a higher cost.
If there is another ‘perfect storm’ of the factors above – as we have seen in recent years – then shortages would have severe implications. For instance, chicken and egg supplies would be critically limited since they cannot be imported. The dairy sector would face a shortfall of about 2.8 million tonnes of feed annually, equating to the requirements of 11% of the national herd, and there would be potential logistics issues in culling livestock in a sudden loss of supply.
Our livestock sectors are exposed to the risk of supply and price issues for imported feed. While the risk is low-moderate, the impact could be significant and we should be taking steps to mitigate this risk.