Assessing Contaminants with Stream Order
Determining whether excluding livestock from large streams in flat catchments would substantially decrease the contaminant load
What Are We Doing?
The New Zealand dairy industry’s Water Accord requires farmers to exclude livestock from all large fourth-order streams – “wider than a stride and deeper than a Red Band gumboot” – by committing to a riparian planting plan (due by 31 May 2020, with 50% of planting complete). Government was considering implementing this as national policy, but this research has contributed to a delay while the policy requirements are reconsidered.
Our research looked at whether excluding livestock from large streams (over 1 metre wide, over 30cm deep) would substantially decrease the load of contaminants (nitrogen, phosphorus, sediment and E.coli) entering waterways.
The researchers found that loads from large streams in flat catchments dominated by pasture accounted for, on average, 23% of the national load of all contaminants. This research suggests additional mitigations should be implemented to reduce the 77% of contaminants that enter waterways from smaller streams in rolling to steep land.
Further Our Land and Water research is now developing a simple tool for farmers to identify mitigations that are more cost-effective than fencing.
How Can The Research Be Used?
- We discovered that fencing only large streams to exclude stock would have less effect on freshwater quality than originally thought. Small, steeply sloping streams contribute, on average, 77% of the load of freshwater contaminants. This work was covered in all major newspapers, and radio and TV stations.
- Farm environment plans and tools such as MitAgator can help farmers target strategies to mitigate contaminant losses from critical source areas. This means that cheaper strategies than fencing can be used to keep livestock out of smaller streams, for better effect.
- The results challenged proposed government stock exclusion regulations.
- This research is now being used by regional government to determine policy to improve the quality of freshwater. For example, Taranaki Regional Council has committed to fencing more streams than those covered by central government’s proposed stock exclusion regulations.
In the Media
Have a Question?
We are happy to answer any questions about this research and how it can be used.
Please fill in the form below
Thank you for your enquiry. Your question may require information to be gathered from the research team, so please anticipate that it may take us up to 10 days to prepare a reply.
We appreciate your interest in our research.